Weekly Summaries

organic food

Which Is Better Conventional Or Organic? – Issue # 165/1

posted by: Joe Vargas Monday 06/01/2015

Organic Is Better Than Conventional In All Regards

Here is some news that are not all that surprising about organic farming, the bottom line is that organic is and will always be the best way to farm and to consume our fresh foods. This info is from an article on foodtank.com, enjoy:


After a 30-year side-by-side comparison of organic and conventional agricultural systems, the Rodale Institute reports that natural systems match, or perhaps outperform, old-fashioned systems in terms of return, productivity, as well as power efficiency, while having good results on dirt wellness, water high quality, and also country areas.

The Rodale Institute has carried out study on organic methods for greater than 60 years. In 1981, Rodale began the Farming Units Trial ® (FST), a project originally developed to study the change from a conventional to a natural farming system. The outcomes of this experiment showed that, after a three-year transition period, returns from the organic system were comparable to those of the conventional system. As a result of these promising results, the Rodale Institute has actually proceeded the FST to now, making it the longest running side-by-side farming test in the United States.

The FST is a comparison of 3 farming systems that create corn and soybeans. The manure-based organic system uses a long turning that includes yearly grain and also forage plants. Operators preserve dirt fertility via using cover crops and also the application of animal manures. The legume-based natural system employs a shorter turning between yearly grains and also leguminous cover crops. The conventional system relies on synthetic fertilizers for soil fertility as well as herbicides for weed command.

In 2011, after 30 years of observing the FST, the Rodale Institute published their research for: the organic systems regularly matched the yields of the traditional system, and also generated higher yields compared to the old-fashioned system under mild drought problems.

On top of that, the organic system surpassed the traditional in several various other areas. In terms of environmental effect, the natural system reduced runoff, stored water as well as nutrients better, recharged groundwater, and also added to rises in soil organic matter. By contrast, the old-fashioned system seeped nutrients and herbicides right into groundwater and made 40 percent a lot more greenhouse gases compared to the natural system. Overall, the natural system required 45 percent less power to preserve.

Environmental influences were not the only benefits of the organic system, however. The Rodale research study also revealed that the natural system was nearly three times as rewarding as the conventional system due to premiums on organic crops, and was still similarly or more profitable than the conventional system without these premiums. Additionally, chemical-free farming systems provide 30 percent more jobs per hectare than conventional systems, which have replaced hands-on labor with mechanized labor. This means that more money in the agricultural sector is going to people, rather than corporations, aiding in the revitalization of rural communities.

The report concludes that “natural farming is far exceptional to conventional systems when it pertains to structure, maintaining and replenishing the health of the soil. For soil health and wellness alone, organic agriculture is a lot more sustainable compared to old-fashioned. When one likewise considers returns, financial viability, energy use, and human health, it’s clear that chemical-free farming is sustainable, while current old-fashioned methods are not.”.

Though the FST has actually produced these compelling results, the experiment is by no means over. In 2008, Rodale added genetically modified (GM) varieties of corn and soy to the conventional system in order to better model standard corn and soy manufacturing in the American Midwest. Furthermore, the test’s operators separated each experimental plot into two sections in order to compare the effects of husbandry as well as no-till methods in each of the three farming systems. In time, the FST may supply significantly needed long-lasting information concerning the effects of GM plants as well as no-till approaches in different kinds of farming systems.

The Rodale FST has influenced lots of various other long-lasting comparative studies of farming systems, which are coming to comparable conclusions.




And Probiotics Supplement



From nature to your hands



3 Articles you need to know about health this week


Check this out!